Based on the Mazda3, the CX-30 is below the CX-5 SUV and competes with several compact and subcompact SUVs, including the Nissan Rogue Sport and Subaru Crosstrek. It is a bit more expensive than those peers, but brings a nicely finished interior and a dash of style. Unfortunately those assets are countered by a noisy engine and tight quarters.
Our tests show the CX-30 is quicker than the similarly-sized Subaru Crosstrek when accelerating flat-out from 0-60 mph. But the Mazda requires a heavy foot on the accelerator to wring power out of the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine, so around-town driving doesn’t feel particularly brisk. Fuel economy is commendable at 27 mpg overall.
We found the CX-30’s handling to be quite responsive and secure. The Mazda steers nicely but it doesn’t possess the same agility found in the Mazda3. The ride is rather firm and can feel jumpy over bumps, and the engine sounds raspy especially at low revs, which detracts from an otherwise quiet interior.
Although not as tiny as the CX-3, the CX-30 still feels cramped inside. The cockpit and center console are nicely trimmed and conceal lots of storage for small items, but the snug design encroaches on the driver and front passenger. The rear seat is tight, and small side windows hurt outward visibility.
As in the Mazda3, we found the infotainment system to be frustrating and overly distracting to use. It requires multiple taps and twists of the rotary knob to execute common and simple radio tasks. We don't mind a parking brake that engages automatically but the fact that Mazda doesn't disengage it automatically when shifting into gear is a major annoyance.
Forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking are standard, but options come packaged in ways that really drive up the price. For example, a power driver’s seat is part of an extra-cost package that also adds heated front seats and an upgraded audio system. A well-equipped CX-30 costs nearly as much as a roomier CX-5 with similar features.